Wednesday, March 25, 2015

America at the last line...with the supply of weapons to #Ukraine

America at the last line...with the supply of weapons to #Ukraine


The State Duma has warned Russia than the US response to the supply of weapons to Ukraine
The State Duma of the Russian Federation must return to President Vladimir Putin the right to send troops to Ukraine if Washington starts real arms supplies to Kiev. This was on Tuesday, March 24, said the first deputy chairman of the faction "Fair Russia" Mikhail Emelyanov. Thus, Moscow made ​​it clear what would be the response to the escalation of the conflict in the South East.
A little before the House of Representatives of the US Congress adopted a resolution recommending to the President US approval of arms sales to Ukraine.
The resolution calls for Barack Obama, "given to him by Congress to apply the authority to give Ukraine lethal lethal defensive weapons." According to the authors of the document, such a move would "increase the chances of the Ukrainian people to protect sovereignty."Furthermore, the resolution rests solely with the Russian responsibility for those killed in the conflict in the Donbass.
"For" the document voted 348 congressmen, "against" - only 48.
"We believe that our Parliament should not pass by this statement," - said Emelyanov.According to him, the Russian Federation can not be created from Ukraine "international blockbuster, sharpened against Russia, armed to the teeth, with the anti-Russian Russophobian power."
The decision of US congressmen on arms Mikhail Emelyanov considers provocative.
"This shows that the United States are not interested in de-escalation of the conflict in the Ukraine ... The United States is trying at all costs to equip Ukraine, because in their geopolitical plans Ukraine is the deterrent towards Russia State that need the US to prevent Russia develop a new superpower ", - said the deputy.
Recall: March 1, 2014, on the eve of the referendum in the Crimea, the Russian president asked the Federation Council authorize the use of military forces in Ukraine "in connection with an extraordinary situation" prevailing in the country, as well as "a threat to the lives of citizens of the Russian Federation", including soldiers of the Black Sea Fleet. On the same day the request was granted. It was assumed that the permit will be valid until the normalization of the political situation in Ukraine, but in June last year, the Federation Council canceled the permission to send troops.
How the situation will develop in the Donbas and around Russia, if the United States still pass the "red line"?
- The US Congress, in adopting resolution, expects to frighten us with the escalation of the conflict in Ukraine, - says a leading expert of the Center for Military-Political Studies, MGIMO, Doctor of Political Sciences Mikhail Alexandrov. - And we need to understand that if we vacillate and to make concessions to the Americans, we will succeed not achieve.
Meanwhile, the statement "Socialist" enough to respond adequately to the United States. In fact, this response - and weak - an attempt to scare States. After all, mind you, Putin none of our legislators did not take away the right to send troops to Ukraine - Russian President he gave it up, and then the State Duma withdrew the decision.
In my opinion, the Kremlin now need to review its policy towards South-East. It is time to understand that only tough and decisive action in Ukraine will make the United States to shut up.
If we, for example, will provide massive aid Novorossia, bringing militias take Kiev, then all the resolution of the US Congress will be worth very little. Moreover, the resolution will be funny - because American arms supply to Ukraine will be no one left. So you need to act, and not to engage in virtual altercation with US lawmakers.
- The United States will take into account the statement of the Russian "Socialist"?
- American deputies more serious guys - compared to our parliamentarians. The House of Representatives, as we see, adopted a resolution unanimously. And why not take our Duma resolution response - say, to condemn the US policy towards Ukraine? Why not prevent that, in response, we also begin the supply of weapons to the Donets Basin and that our Parliament legally oblige the President of the Russian Federation to provide military assistance to South-East?
That is how we should respond. But while we are talking about individual statements of some Russian deputies. Americans seriously do not perceive such demarches ...
- Your forecast: what will happen in the Donbass?
- After another reconciliation, sure starts escalation of hostilities. This can only be one thing: if Ukraine will clinch Poroshenko and Igor Kolomoisky.
Let me remind you that the Ukrainian president and Dnepropetrovsk oligarch not divided largest oil and gas company of the country - "Ukrnafta". Businessman went broke and turned the office into a fortress, saying that the new director will not let into the chair, and the amendments adopted by Parliament in company law, will be challenged in court. Poroshenko gave in response to the challenge Kolomoisky armed guards day. And also said that in the near future will deprive all the governors of the so-called "pocket battalions."
If it comes to fighting in Dnepropetrovsk, this is a time Kiev distract from the conflict in the Donbass. If Poroshenko be able to quickly defeat the Kolomoiskiy, he very likely immediately resume military operation in the South East - on the wave of success to improve its image in the eyes of the radical wing of the Ukrainian society.
- Russia can play on the conflict-Poroshenko Kolomoysky?
- Of Course. In principle, now Kolomoisky interested in seeing that the militias of the LC and the DNI struck a "corridor" to Dnepropetrovsk. This would give the Ukrainian oligarch tool for further bargaining with Kiev. For us it is - a good option.
Generally, our goal is to internal conflicts in the Ukraine has always supported the weak side.Then the parties will be constantly sort things out, and they had no strength left to fight the Donbass ...
- Resolution of the US Congress is advisory in nature - like a military expert, director of the Center for Strategic conditions Ivan Konovalov. - That's why Barack Obama has repeatedly proven to be careful - with all the love of martial tirades - think a hundred times before following the resolution.
If there was evidence that Obama is willing to give "good" for the supply of weapons Ukrainians is activated Europe. So was the case in February, when the US was close to having to start the supply of arms Kiev. Then German Chancellor Angela Merkel managed to convince Obama to abandon their plans. Now this situation could happen again.
Finally, there is an additional constraint. Even in the United States realize that weapons supplied to Ukraine, can raspolztis worldwide. Part of it, no doubt, grab militias, some will be sold corrupt structures of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine. As a result, before the actual confrontation line in the Donbass may not reach almost nothing.
Therefore, in my opinion, the resolution of the congress - a symbolic gesture, which, however, demonstrates the depth of anti-Russian American Parliament. I think our legislative branch responds to gesture Americans accordingly.
One answer - really back to President Putin the right to send troops to Ukraine. In general, the actions of the United States would only exacerbate the confrontation in the Donbass, and delayed the time of settlement in the Donbass.
- The United States is likely to decide on the supply of weapons, - said military expert, retired colonel Semyon Bagdasarov. - What we need in response to announce the opening of the supply of arms to militias of New Russia, including modern. For example, anti-tank missile complexes "Cornet".
In addition, the State Duma deputies should attend to the enactment of the Russian military private companies. This will dramatically increase the number of professionally trained volunteers traveling to the South-East, and create from them a capable army.
- Do you think the Russian forces in Ukraine, you need not?
- This is not necessary. There are other, more effective - and not so loud - response on the part of Russia, two of which I have already announced. We need to move in this direction ...
View this content on moevideo_net's website

No comments:

Post a Comment